Followers

RSS

Lecture task week 8 IVY CLARE

Lecture Task
 (a) Compare and contrast McDonough and Shaw, Maley and Tomlinson and Masuhara adaptation techniques. Are there are differences or are they similar?
Adaptation Technique
McDonough & Shaw
Maley
Tomlinson & Masuhara
McDonough & Shaw’s Techniques
       Adding – Expanding & Extending
       Deleting – subtracting & abridging
       Modifying – re-writing & re-structuring
       Simplifying
       Re-ordering

Techniques for
materials adaptation
1. omission: the teacher leaves out things
deemed inappropriate, offensive,
unproductive, etc., for the particular group.

2. addition: where there seems to be
inadequate coverage, teachers may decide to
add to textbooks, either in the form of texts
or exercise material.
3. reduction: where the teacher shortens an activity to give it less weight or emphasis.
4. extension: where an activity is lengthened in
order to give it an additional dimension. (For
example, a vocabulary activity is extended to
draw attention to some syntactic patterning.)
5. rewriting/modification: teacher may
occasionally decide to rewrite material, especially
exercise material, to make it more
appropriate, more “communicative”, more
demanding, more accessible to their students,
etc.
6. replacement: text or exercise material which is
considered inadequate, for whatever reason, may be
replaced by more suitable material. This is often
culled from other resource materials.
7. re-ordering: teachers may decide that the order in
which the textbooks are presented is not suitable for
their students. They can then decide to plot a
different course through the textbooks from the one
the writer has laid down.
8. branching: teachers may decide to add options to the
existing activity or to suggest alternative pathways
through the activities. (For example, an experiential
route or an analytical route.)



divided into
three main categories in terms of quantity:
Plus (+), Minus (-) or Zero (0)

Plus:
·         Techniques- Examples
·         Addition- Teachers may add different text or activities
·         Expansion- Teachers may expand texts and activities by increasing the length, difficulty, depth, etc.
Minus:
·         Techniques- Examples
·         Deletion- Teachers may delete some texts and/or activities together
·         Subtraction- Teachers may decrease the number of sentences in a text or part of an activity
·         Reduction- Teachers may reduce texts and activities by decreasing the length, difficulty, depth, etc.
Zero:
·         Techniques- Examples
·         Modification- Teachers may make changes to instructions
·         Replacement- Teachers may swap one activity with another
·         Reorganization- teachers may change the positions of texts and illustrations
·         Resequencing- Teachers may change the sequence of activities
·         Conversion- Teachers may change the genre of a text (from narrative to poem), or move the content from one medium to another (e.g. from print to a web page)

By thoroughly comparing and contrasting the adaptation techniques suggested by all three (McDonough&Shaw, Maley, Tomlinson&Masuhara), we noticed that all three techniques are fairly similar eventhough the terms are named differently.
Differences
The only difference between them is the organization of their techniques. For example, in McDonough & Shaw and Maley , the techniques are just organised in a simple and direct manner from ‘adding’ to ‘ re-ordering’ and ‘omission’ to ‘branching’. As for Tomlinson & Masuhara , they divided their techniques into categories which relates by the type of adaptation they are using. In our opinion, Tomlinson & Masuhara’s choice of organisation is useful whereby it can be easily be chosen by teachers based on what they would like to do with their materials.
Similarities
All of the techniques used are similar even if they have different terms. They can be categorised based on what is done to the materials when using the techniques. For example, the common technique found between them is addition. In all three techniques, they suggested that teachers can add and expand the materials using activities or exercises. The same goes for reduction. In McDonough & Shaw’s techniques, the term used is ‘simplifying’ while Maley uses the term ‘reduction’ and Tomlinson & Masuhara categorises it into ‘Minus’. All three terms share the same usage or adaptation which is removing or subtracting the unnecessary parts of the materials. Eventhough all three techniques are not organized the same, the usage or ways of adapting a material are fairly similar.


                           
(b) Compare and contrast McDonough and Shaw with Tomlinson and Masuhara’s materials  adaptation procedures. Are there are differences or are they similar?

McDonough and Shaw
Tomlinson and Masuhara
Materials’ Adaptation Procedures

         i.            -Profiling of teaching context
       ii.            -Identifying reasons for adaptation
      iii.           -   Evaluating
     iv.            -Listing Objectives
       v.            -Adapting
     vi.            -Teaching
    vii.          -Revising

Generally, the first move of materials’ adaptation procedures in both the McDonough & Shaw and Tomlinson and Masuhara are the same. They are only different in terms. In McDonough & Shaw, the first thing need to be identified in adapting a material is to match certain internal and external criteria to the material. External factors comprise both the overt claims made about materials and the characteristics of particular situation. Internal factors are concerned with content, organization and consistency. In this context, the matching and congruency is needed in order to localise (as in bringing in the local culture into teaching), personalise (relating the material to learners’ personal schema as in interpersonal use), individualise (relating the material to learners’ background information) and modernise (incorporate IT into teaching)the material used. This is the same as the one in Tomlinson & Masuhara’s procedure which is profiling of teaching context. It is same as there is the need to collect information about something so that later, a description about it can be done. This is important as it helps to identify the reasons/needs for adaptation. After identifying the reasons, evaluation will take place. The material will be evaluated to determine how it should be adapted in order to fit the learners’ context.
In term of differences, McDonough & Shaw do have something which is different compared to Tomlinson & Masuhara. It is that McDonough & Shaw provides specific techniques used in the material adaption. The techniques are adding (expanding and extending), deleting (subtracting and abridging), modifying (re-writing and re-structuring), simplifying (as in simplify the sentence structure) and re-ordering (putting parts of a coursebook into different order). These techniques will be applied into content areas such as language practice, tests, skills and classroom management. In other words, the material will undergo addition, deletion, modification, simplification and re-order to ‘fit’ the tests, language practice, skills and also in creating more effective classroom management.
As for Tomlinson & Masuhara, the listing of objectives comes after the evaluation. The objectives are important as it affects how the adaption to the material is to be done in the next step. However, there is no specific ‘techniques’ stated on how the adaptation should be done. In fact, the next step proceeds straight to teaching and lastly revising.

(c) List and discuss the levels of materials adaptation.
Textbook adaptation can be done at three levels. The first level is macro adaptation, which is ideally done before the language programme begins. After comparing what is covered in a textbook and what is required by the syllabus or examination, the teacher may find that certain areas or even whole units of the book can be omitted, and certain contents need to be supplemented. Macro adaptation is very important because it helps to avoid waste of time and energy of the teacher and the students as well. It also helps the teacher to see in advance what he or she needs to supplement so that he or she can keep an eye on materials that could be used. Based on Malaysia education context, finishing every syllabus of the English textbook is a prerequisite and the teachers are not allowed to choose another textbook. Having options to selecting textbook for teaching is not encouraging in Malaysia. Thus, it is impossible for English teachers in Malaysia to pick another textbook based on their thought in order to teach their students. On the other hand, teachers should evaluate the whole unit in the textbook and make selections on what chapters they should emphasize or less emphasize on based on the probability of the questions which will be asked in exams. For example, the topic’ pollution’,  ‘health’ and ‘technology’ are very common and popular that it have higher probability of coming out in exams. So, teachers should emphasize on those chapters.
The second level is of adaptation is adapting a unit. This could be reordering the activities, combining activities, omitting activities, rewriting or supplementing exercise material, etc. Unit adaptation helps to make the classroom teaching more smooth and cohesive. It also helps the teacher to better fulfil the aims of a unit. Before entering the class, the teacher must go through the textbook units and make decision about which activity or task is applicable in the textbook. The activity or task which are not very useful and does not give students much comprehensible input and new information, then activity can be omitted and teacher needs to replace or modify the omitted activity with a better one.
The third level is adaptation of specific activities in a unit. Occasionally an activity is regarded as valuable, but it is not well-designed or it is not feasible in a particular class. If the teacher does not want to give up the activity, he or she needs to adapt it. For instance, the activity is hard to be integrated in the classroom but it is crucial for students’ understanding in the certain objective of that particular task. Hence, the teacher should put more effort to modify or conduct and give students a clearer picture about that particular activity so that students can carry out this activity in a more efficient way.
(d) Without going in-depth into your 2nd part of your assignment (adapt and create), discuss in general what level of materials adaptation you will be using (it can be all three levels but used at different areas in the materials) and techniques you will employ to enrich the chapter you have evaluated. Briefly state the types of tasks which will accompany the current material. Please mention if there are media accompaniment with that task.
In chapter 9, there are two roles play activities where students have to work in pair. The situation of the roles play given is a conversation between a mother and a son and the other one is conversation of a doctor and his patient.  
Activity:
Firstly students have to choose either one of the situation given. They have to type out their conversation in not less than 120 words and the content of their conversation should include vocabulary and points related to their situation. This means that they have to do this task just like how they usually do in their exam for the writing/ essay section.
 They then have to act out the situation in a very authentic way and record the whole process. Their conversation has to be based on their dialogue that they have typed.
After doing both the writing and roles play part, they have to post their outcome into their tumblr account.
Each pair also has to “check out” what the other pairs have posted on their tumblr wall by giving likes and comments, and each pair has to give likes and comments to at least 5 of the other pairs. 
One of the techniques that have been implied in this activity was Maley’s adaptation techniques of branching. Maley suggested that “teachers may decide to add options to the existing activity or to suggest alternative pathways through the activities. (For example, an experiential route or an analytical route.) “. So, for the roles play activity, students can either choose the conversation between the mother and son or, the conversation between a doctor and his patient. By choosing different situation, the content, vocabulary and points that need to be included by students will be different.

Other techniques that have been included in this activity are the addition and expansion techniques proposed by Tomlinson and Masuhara. For the addition technique, Tomlinson and Masuhara stated that “teachers may add different text or activities”. Hence, there is a writing task added into the roles play activity to let students practice in their writing skill. As for the expansion technique, Tomlinson and Masuhara stated that “teachers may expand texts and activities by increasing the length, difficulty, depth, etc.” The difficulty was increased when students are required to prepare a conversation that must include certain types of language features based on the situation that have been chosen., which include points that are related to their topic. On the other hand, students are also required to memorise their dialogues and act it out in front of a recording video and show authenticity in during the roles play. This means that students have to practice few times so they can perform this task more efficiently, and this can help them in their speaking skills. 

Ivy's reflection:
I have learn a lot about adapting activities provided in textbook. Although we alerady learn and exposed the fact that we could modify activities that are not suitable in our teaching, but the powerpoint really helped   lot in giving more understanding to how to specifically adapt and modify the activities according to our preferences.
Sorry Ms, my blogger account has some problem,can't save and post anything. :O

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Lecture task week 8 reflection





 Leanza’s reflection:
After completing the task, I realized that the materials adaptation has included different techniques. We, as the teachers who wish to apply the teaching and learning materials efficiently can reorder, combine, add, reduce omit or simplify the materials for the students. Those techniques are applied to the teaching materials by teachers and educators in order to have the students understand about what is being learnt and reach the learning objective of that particular lesson according to the syllabus. Before entering the class, the teachers have to be well prepared with the materials and although it is not applicable, teachers can readjust or repeat the techniques so the materials can help students to achieve learning objectives.  
 According to the lecture task given, I have a rough idea about the materials adaptation that it actually consists of levels. What we find out confusing is the first level and the second level of the materials adaptation. This is because we think that the both first and second level adaptations are similar based on the explanation given from the slides. After having the discussion, our group made a conclusion that the first level of adaptation is related to the selection of textbook whereas the second level of adaptation is related to the selection and modification of activities.  
Last but not least, the last part of the lecture task actually helped us to apply it to the students and we will try to imagine what technique we will include in modifying our activity and materials in order to help the students to boost up in their certain skills. This helped us to know what technique we will integrate in materials adaptation and materials developing and hence, produce students with better proficiency levels of English in the future. 

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

CHECKPOINT

AnsweRs~

CHECKPOINT

EXAMPLES OF DIGITAL LANGUAGE LEARNING MATERIALS







blogger




comic strips








e- mail



online tool






youtube


glogster




garageband


tumblr



word charm


second life


skype







Sketch a rough outline of the digital material you used.




What is wideo?
An animated online video creation tool that allows you to create, edit & share online videos for free.
How to use it?
Teacher can create an animated video based on the topic they want to teach in the lesson. Teacher can create the character and storyboard based on their creativity.
Visual design and rough outline of why our group use Wideo
1. Balance and symmetry
-We can bring balance to the elements of different sizes by either moving them closer or
further from the center of the page.
-Symmetry is when one half of a visual display is a mirror image of the other half.
          -Types of symmetry: horizontal, approximate horizontal, radial and asymmetry.
          2. Emphasis
- Create dominance and focus in their work.
- It emphasize on colour, value, shapes or other design elements to achieve dominance.
-For example we are using Wideo, so if the background is too colourful or catchy, so the
color of the words in the dialogue must be contrast than the background.
3. Alignment
-Alignment of elements within a screen is important part of organizing and grouping.
-Should visually maximize differences between text, label and pictures.
-For the Wideo, the character and the dialogue must be well organised in able the students
          to understand the contents. 
4. Unity
- Relationship among visual elements that helps all elements to work together.
- Gives a sense of closure or oneness to a visual image.
- Can be achieved through use of similar shapes, common pattern or use of a common background.




List out SLA Theories and Principles.

SLA Theories

-Behaviorist theory

-Interactionist theory

-Innatist theory

Principles

-Materials should achieve impact.

-Materials should help learner to feel at ease.

-Materials should help learners to develop confidence.

-What is being taught should be perceived by learners as relevant and useful.

-Materials should require and facilitate learners’ self- investment.

-Learners must be ready to acquire the points being taught.

-Materials should expose the learners to language in authentic use.

-The learners’ attention should be drawn to linguistic features of the input.

-Materials should provide the learners with opportunities to use the target to achieve communicative purposes.

-Materials should take into account that the positive effects of instructions are usually delayed.

-Materials should take into account that learners differ in learning styles.

-Materials should take into account that learners differ in affective attitudes.

-Materials should permit a silent period at the beginning of instructions.

-Materials should not force premature speaking in the target language.

-Materials should maximise learning potential by encouraging intellectual, aesthetic and emotional involvement which simulates both right and left brain activities.

-Materials should not rely on too much on controlled practice.

-Materials should provide opportunities for outcome and feedback.

-Materials should help the learners to develop cultural awareness and sensitivity.

-Materials should reflect the reality of language use.

-Materials should help learners to learn in ways similar to the circumstances in which they will have to use the language.

-Materials should help to create readiness to learn.


CRITERIA OF PEDAGOGICAL USABILITY:

1.Learner control

Break down the material into meaningful units in order for them to memorize.

2.Learner activity

Teachers as facilitators producing scaffold medium for students.

3.  Cooperative or Collaborative learning

-Studying with others to reach a common learning goal.

-The members gather and structure the information.

-Communication and negotiation happens when learner tools are offered.

4. Goal orientation

-Best results can be attained if goals of teachers, students, and learning material are closely related.

-Students should have chance to make choices with respect to their course in relation to goals.

5. Applicability

-learned knowledge should be transferred to other contexts.

-should be of appropriate level of the point of view of learners’ learning process.

6. Added value

-In the form of creative use of possibilities that computers offer.

Computer assisted learning:

(i)                adaptability to individual needs.

(ii)             numbers of flexible options.

(iii)           learning is controlled by learner, initiated and in the form of learner desires.

(iv)           Consist of interesting contents.

(v)             Promote development of communication.

(vi)           Active participation of students.

7. Motivation

-talks about intrinsic and extrinsic orientation.

8. Valuation of previous knowledge

-favour elaboration, contemplation or new issues and analysis of their relationship with learners earlier knowledge constructs.

-learning material review central concepts from earlier studies that are important for understanding present material.

9. Flexibility

-have diverse assignments in material.

- adaptable, broadly defined, hence it is easier to fit students’ individual needs.

10. Feedback

- should provide encouraging and immediate feedback.

-from computers: can have immediate response of students’ action.

-from peers: support reflection given, depends on the quality of interaction.



Leanza's reflection:
Basically, I can manage to understand and have a clearer picture about digital language learning material now compared to a few weeks ago. For my opinion, this material is so advanced and will be applicable in the future as the students nowadays are so get use to technology tools. It can be clearly seen that in the urban area every student is holding a smart phones and their daily routine nowadays can't sustain without Internet. It can be said that they are so addcited to the Internet world when it is integrated into language learning classroom, it may grasp students' attention and hence, they will pay a little more interest to language learning via the integrating of digital language learning material into classrooms. To sketch a rough outline, that is the problem at the first when we saw the checkpoint. So, we were actually confused to what we should do or post or design for this task. Therefore, our group finally came out a conclusion or a solution which is to select a DLLM and create an activity using the DLLM. When we were having the discussion about how to design it, we took the criteria of the article as a reference. We find out the criteria of the pedagogical usability helpful and it guides us to prepare an appropriate and applicable material for the students and we hope that the material developed is understandable for the students. After selection for the materials, our group decided to use Wideo.
For the pedagogical usability, I found it useful to create the DLLM as it can help us as the future teachers or the novice educators to have a rough guideline for creating the DLLM. The information provided from the articles that we were asked to go through provided the criteria to invent a DLLM. The criteria given help us to have a clearer map about what we are going to have for our assignments as it helps us to have idea about what shall be taken into consideration when it comes to create the DLLM. Apart from that, it can be seen that the article provided the principles or so called characteristics to effectively design a webpage is helpful and the information above this part is useful as well. This is because we, as the future teachers can take it as a reference when it comes to create a webpage as an access or a medium to communicate with our students or initiate a new start to have involvement of students towards language learning.
Conclusively, I personally think that the tasks given gave us a guideline on how are we going to create a DLLM based on the criteria listed under pedagogical usability of the article. Creating a DLLM is an uneasy task yet it is helpful for the future students who have no intentions to study or learning language. The DLLM may grasp their attention as they are so curios about how do the application of DLLM can be integrated into classrooms. Implicitly, they have already exposed to the content and will pay more interest in order to participate and finally they will be managed to learn the language although it happens consciously and yet without their knowing.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Tutorial Task Week 3 Materials Development


Tutorial Task Week 3 Materials Development

a) Identify the theory behind communicative language teaching approach. (Spada and Sauvignon)

Audio-lingual method is introduced and applied to the language learning classrooms before the existence of different approaches and methods which are more engaging. This audio-lingual method is based on the behaviourist theory. The learners are required to listen and imitate in order to learn the particular language. They will listen to a CD and do some selection repetition to a certain phrase. The learners will be learning chunks, sentences and words. There will be the occurrence of negotiation of meaning through the use of language.

Hymes stated that each human being needs four competences namely discourse competence, pragmatic competence, linguistic competence and strategic competence. Communicative competence means the ability to communicate and ability to negotiate with meaning. The focus was not on language learning but language as social behavior.

Linguistic competence is the ability to put grammatical functions and items into place. It is also about the knowledge of application of linguistic knowledge. The area covered under linguistic competence could be spelling, grammar, pronunciation and vocabulary. A communication without linguistic competence could lead to communication breakdown. This is because learners do not have the syntactic knowledge to express themselves. They might utter some sentences or words that are meaningless as they are unable to choose the appropriate lexis.

As for discourse competence, it is the ability to produce meaningful speech by focusing on the structure of spoken and written discourse. It is metacognitive and talks about how language is used in a particular context. When it comes to discourse competence, IRF (initiate, respond and feedback) is explained. It is about the organization of sentences, linguistic and context. For instance, discourse in classrooms; it will be started with greetings from students to teachers. Then, teachers will ask students about what they have learnt for the previous lessons. Teachers will list or state out generally what the students are going to be taught for the present lessons. So, it is basically about how to use a language to tell students what the context are and producing texts with cohesion.

Pragmatic competence is important as it help learners to deliver and interpret intentions with the usage of appropriate language or context. It is also vital as it determine the ability of learners in avoiding anxiety. Basically, it is about how you understand the language is being used in certain situation as in whether it is formal or informal. For example, a teacher asked one of the students to switch on the light and he or she is using a word please- ‘please switch on the light’. In this situation, students need to realize that the teacher has a higher authority and they will have to obey her regardless of whether the teacher uses “please” or not. Students have to be able to differentiate or identify formal, neutral and informal conversations. This is especially important in multi-racial country like Malaysia to avoid miscommunications among the different communities.

Last but not least, strategic competence which refers to the ability to maintain communication. There are several ways to achieve it. For instance, by using gestures, nonverbal or verbal conversations, cues, pictures, elaboration, and also by raising your voice to get your point to cross. There will be learners who have a limited range of vocabulary especially beginners. In this situation, non-verbal gestures may play an important role to them in helping them to deliver their point across. For instance, they can use body movements to indicate actions like running, eating and singing. Each learner will or may adapt different strategies in maintaining interaction between interlocutors.

b) State the implications of communicative language teaching towards materials development.

In communicative language teaching (CLT), learners are encouraged more to speak with fluency rather than accuracy. It is important for them to be able to communicate or relay their message to others despite having grammatical errors. There are two communicative approaches namely weak and strong. The ‘weak’ approach stresses the importance of providing learners with opportunities to use English for communicative purposes (role play) and the ‘strong’ approach stated language is acquired through communication.

In a communicative-based classroom, activities are designed to promote language production that is creative, unpredictable and purposeful to improve learners’ fluency through sharing information and negotiating meaning, compared to a traditional classroom where focus is on mastering linguistic items

Learners’ should look at what message they should convey, rather than how it should be spoken. Yet Swain (1985) proposed that learners should have more reliance on syntax and less reliance on semantics, in which the comprehensible input hypothesis (CMOH) is opposed with the previous sentence which mentioned that learners should emphasize on the content of message conveyed instead of how it is spoken. However, Long (1996) proposed Interactionist Theory which is a combination of the CMOH and IH. For the Long’s Interactionist Theory, there are more interaction between learners and others and the negotiation of meaning happens.

Materials promoting fluency focus on the outcome instead of the process, for example information-gap, opinion-gap and reasoning-gap. Not to mention that well developed language skills help learners communicate effectively. For example, obtaining a wide range of vocabulary in their mental dictionaries helps learners develop their ability to perform in the language. When reading a technical passage, learners have to use their scanning and skimming (reading skills) to infer or extract information, summarize (reading and speaking skills) the information and produce a report (writing skills). Learners have to utilize their linguistic, discourse and pragmatic competences to help them understand the technical passage. This helps develop learners’ understanding of the English language system.

An implication of the communicative approach towards methodology is that materials and tasks should reflect authenticity, as they bridge the real-world and the classroom. Rogers and Medley (1988) defines authentic as language reflecting “a naturalness of form, and an appropriateness of cultural and situational context that would be found in the language as used by native speakers”. Authentic sources would then reflect text (spoken or written) used in native or target language speaking context. However, the suitability of the materials (difficulty, cultural and social relevance) could actually be a problem in terms of the learners’ proficiency level and interest. Learners could be unmotivated by the materials, affecting focus on learning. If the learners find out the developed English language learning materials challenging, teacher needs to adapt the activity in the coursebook around the authentic sources to make the materials comprehensible and hence, usable among learners.

In the communicative approach, the role of teacher and learner has evolved. Nowadays, teacher has the role of facilitating learners’ language learning progress by designing, executing and managing activities in the classroom. This puts demands on non-native speaking teachers confidence, skills and knowledge as classroom situations become less structured. The learner takes on a more active role of becoming “communicators and autonomous learners” in language learning. The classroom environment has become more learners centered. Teachers would need to incorporate or make learners more aware of language learning strategies to help learners attain autonomy in their own learning. For example, strategies employed when reading a text: skimming for ideas, scanning from content, and identifying key vocabulary. Nevertheless, non-native speakers often reflect a more traditional role of learners in the classroom. In certain contexts learners are not familiar with being proactive with learning due to the exam-oriented education system influencing different social factors e.g. entrance to tertiary education level indirectly affecting learner’s kudos in society (Gupta, 2004). Teachers face a challenge in guiding learners from the traditional to a more active role in the classroom. This reality can be clearly seen in Malaysia as so far vast majority of teachers strongly believe that finishing up the syllabus is the most concerns in spite of providing successful learners. They have to accomplish the schools’ curriculum objectives and aims in spite of their targets which the schools’ aims is the higher passing rate on the particular language in national based examinations compared to the previous years.

Reversing the learners’ role is easier if teachers are supported by policy makers, empirical evidence from research in a non-native context and materials such as coursebooks to help teachers overcome this problem. The communicative approach should not be accepted as a packaged method, but should be context-dependent to benefit the teachers and learners to achieve its goal – to become communicatively competent. The teachers can help the learners to develop language skills by integrating the approach or the developed materials which is relevant and after consider about several conditions such as different learning styles among learners, different proficiency levels and others. The social context in which learning takes place has become an important factor in determining whether the implementation of communicative approach is succeed or not. When the learners’ conditions are taken into consideration before the approaches are integrated and the suitable language learning materials are developed, the learners might be more interested and they end up developing language skills.

c) Locates principles supporting CLT within the KBSM English Language Curriculum and F1 English Language Syllabus.

1. Form and maintain relationships through conversations and correspondence, take part in social interaction and interact to obtain goods and services.

~ Principle 1: Teach communicative competence (linguistic): Linguistic competence includes the ability to use grammar appropriately. This is because grammar (noun, adverb, verbs etc) needs to be taught and be part and parcel in learning outcomes. Although students might have a low proficiency in the English language but, their knowledge in grammar is vital especially in allowing them to interact effectively with people. So, teachers need to construct a task or activity that can emphasize more on grammar. While constructing that kind of task or activity, teachers need to relate it with current or real life situation, so the students will be more familiar with it as well as can learn better.

Principle 2: Practice functions and forms in context-rich environments.

The discourse competence can be brought into this context as students are to be taught to produce meaningful sentences. They may do so by practicing the different functions and forms of words. For instance, the word “please” is used when asking for favours from someone. In context-rich environments, students can learn and practice cohesion in sentences. That way, they may identify the ‘semantic relationships’ using discourse markers and connectors.

2. Obtain, process and use information from various audio-visual and print sources, and present the information in spoken and written form.

Principle 2: Practice functions and forms in context-rich environments (discourse and linguistic competence).

This is also more to the discourse and linguistic competence context. Students will assemble and use the information they get from various sources to produce texts in either spoken or written form. A text with cohesion allows readers to get the gist and understand it.  In terms of linguistic competence, students need to learn the correct grammar and vocabulary. By having them, it will definitely help the students in delivering their message more clearly and accurate.

Principle 4: Give priority to fluency over accuracy.

The linguistic and pragmatic competence will play their parts in this context too. Teachers need to teach other words when dealing with topic and syllabus to enhance the students’ vocabulary. Teachers also should adapt and change the words according to the proficiency level of the class so that the students will have a variety of word choices. The students can “play” with words as well as use them in writing and speaking. The educational system emphasize on fluency over accuracy to make sure students are ready to take field works and facing the real world (social life). Having pragmatic competence allows them to converse and communicate using the simplest words. For instance, they will learn the basics in greeting people such as ‘Good morning’, ‘How are you?’ and many more. Students may have problems in pronouncing certain words but as long the sentence structure or cohesion is there, the listener will somehow get the idea of what is being said to them.
3.Listen to, view, read and respond to different texts, and express ideas, opinions, thoughts and feelings imaginatively and creatively in spoken and written form.

Principle 5: Adopt a learner-centered attitude

Teacher regards or treats the students as partner. So, in order to achieve the vision, teacher’s role need to change. According to the principle, the teacher’s role changes in the three stages of the language teaching operation. First, teacher acts as an informant in the presentation stage, then in the practice stage, teacher plays the role as a conductor and lastly in the production stage, teacher will be a guide and a co-communicator. Through these stages, the students will be more comfortable in learning and slowly established their own attitudes in learning.

Principle 7: Promote Collaborative and Cooperative Learning

Learning tasks should be designed to require true and active communicative interactions between learners and should involve both input and help in learners’ production. Learning tasks also should encourage negotiation of meaning – changes in language will happen. This is because students who have low proficiency level cannot accomplish a task for higher level students, so they need guidance in doing the task step by step while slowly achieving the high level of proficiency. Collaborative learning enables students to interact more among themselves and at the same time, sharing knowledge with each other. It also triggers peer feedback which may lead to positive impacts. For instance, they might discover new idea while discussing certain topics and clarify certain grammar rules when they faced confusions.

Principle 8: Provide Error Corrective Feedback

There are three types of feedbacks which are positive feedback, negative feedback and both feedbacks. Positive feedback is to confirm the accuracy of learner’s response whilst negative feedback is more to error correction. As for both responses, they are to facilitate learning when delivered effectively. By giving feedback to students, they will be motivated and will learn better because they know their mistakes and the reason behind them.

 

d) Identify general categories and specific items to evaluate chapters in a Malaysian English Language textbook.

In the Malaysian context, it is undeniable that we are not users of English as a first language. However, we do share similarities in the context of EFL learners in other countries such as the differences in proficiency levels of the learners.

The general categories to evaluate chapters would be:-

a) Educational context- In terms of the educational context, it is important to determine whether the context is relevant and provides proper education. The contents in the textbook should reflect what a second language learner is ought to learn or know. Besides that, the context should also be based on the culture of that particular country. For instance, the culture in Western and Eastern countries will definitely be different given that the English language has different ‘stand’. In Western countries such as America and England, English is their L1 while in countries like Malaysia and Brunei, English is their L2. So, the educational context should be focus more on the function of the English language in that particular country. 

b) Learning Theories- The chapters should be designed based on the learning theories such as the SLA theories and the principle of teaching and learning. Activities in the textbook can be designed to create more interactions among students (interactionist theory) and encourage teachers to apply the principles they had learnt into the activities. For instance, teachers can actually create new activities using new materials in order to enhance students’ learning as long as the learning objectives can be achieved. The principle in materials developments suggested teachers to focus on authenticity in usage of materials and linking them to students’ everyday lives.

c) Curriculum- The textbook is all based on the curriculum. This is to suit the ‘target’ the country intended to achieve. The curriculum will be the base or guidance in determining the context (chapters) in a textbook.

d) Facilitate learning- The main function of a textbook is to facilitate learning in classrooms. The chapters in the textbook are divided into several different topics and it may help students to understand them better. For instance, the chapter ‘Friends and Family’ will teach the students more about family in the Malaysian context. The textbook provide pictures and exercises to further their understanding.

e) Learner’s diversity- The topics/chapters in the textbooks are different according to the students’ level. For instance, the chapters in a Form 1 English textbook are different with the chapters in a Form 5 English textbook. The words or terms used in the textbooks are also different as the proficiency level of students in different Form differs. 

f) Teacher’s beliefs- So far, teachers in schools all teach the English language by using the textbook as the main source. In order for an effective teaching of English to occur in class, that will have to depend on the method the teachers used and whether they have the intention to hold on to their principles. Their beliefs are what may change the students’ learning process. It can be said that the teachers themselves know what would be the best method to teach the students in their own class. Different teachers have different strategies and beliefs in teaching. However, their beliefs are often shaped by the curriculum and the schools’ vision.

g) Psychological validity- The contents of the chapters in a textbook should be rational and creative. Students should be able to answer the questions either independently or through cooperation with peers. It is important for their self-development as well as helping them in developing good characters.

h) Pedagogical validity- Another important criterion is that the textbook should act as guidance to both the students and teachers. There should be choices of activities that teachers can conduct in class. As for the activities, it will be better if students are able to do their very own reflection by the end of the activity. This is to ensure that they will remember what they had learnt and be able to identify their mistakes or errors. 

i) Process and content validity- The contents should be relevant to the students. Contents that students can relate to their daily lives are often easier for them to grasp. Besides that, creativity plays an important role in the textbook’s contents. They should appeal to the students and trigger their creative thinking.

Leanza’s reflection:

The competences that have been taught during the previous lesson are related to the communicative language teaching. I can ‘slightly’ have a clear image about the complexity of communicative language teaching or shall I just say materials development? This is because every theories and approaches or principles are seemed interrelated. For instance, when we talk about principles of materials development, the things that we have been exposed during second language acquisition is related.

Before Miss JC explained the question (a) during the tutorial on Monday, I personally thought that the theory lying behind communicative language teaching approach is related to hypothesis and theories of second language acquisition. The answers that I have prepared were something about interationist theories, sociocultural difference and comprehensible input hypothesis. After the tutorial, I can understand that it is actually about the four competences which are namely pragmatic competence, discourse competence, linguistic competence and strategic competence. Before the language learning become more engaging, the learners are exposed to audiolingual method. For my opinion, the learners usually apply bahaviourist theory consciously or unconsciously when they start to learn something. Based on behaviourist theory, the learners are exposed to positive and negative reinforcement in order to learn or a language, or acquire when they are familiar with it.

Next, for question (b), the main point that our group would like to emphasize on is trying to switch the learning environment from traditional approach to learner centered learning for stating the implications of communicative language teaching approach towards materials development. For my opinion, to having a switch on the learning environment from the traditional way to learners centered is a challenge for the teachers and educators nowadays. We can clearly see that because of different kinds of distraction, passive learners are produced recently. For instance, the learners or so called students nowadays could be distracted by the mobile phones or missing about playing computer games at home, or thinking about what facebook status should they post when they reach home later after school. Hence, it is a probably unreachable target for the teachers to grasp the learners’ attention. However, the developed materials might give a shot as the learners might pay attention to the teaching and learning when the materials is relevant to their daily routine (teachers should consider about the tremendous change of the living style of the students nowadays, especially the urban area when it comes to develop suitable language learning material). Here comes the authenticity and the learners who are interested with the topic and with the help of developed materials applied in classrooms, the learners are able to develop certain language skills according to the learning objectives and activities conducted in classrooms by teachers.  

For the question ©, I would like to point on a few principles of the answer s of our tutorial task week 3. The first principle would be adopting learner centered attitude. Frankly to say, the students nowadays are passive learners. They refused to take part in any activity in classrooms, even having problem to hand in the homework on time (based on my teaching experience during semester break). They are passive and even teacher prepared the games, they refused to involve as well. So, I personally think that this principle should be take the learners’ attitude and understanding level into consideration before any activity is planned. Secondly will be the error correction. For my opinion, error correction is encouraged to be on the spot as it can help the students to remember it longer in the length on time. However, if the students are being responsive and yet the answers they have given are actually wrong, what teachers have to do is correct them. It will be fine if they are corrected a few times but if it happens too often, the students will be demotivated and they refused to participate in any discussions in classrooms anymore. This might affect their academic performance indirectly as well. 

Last but not least, for question (d), the categories to evaluate a Malaysia English textbook are listed down. I strongly agree that the teachers' belief are shaped by schools' aims. Instead of strive for their own targets which they wish their students to reach certain proficiency levels or develop certain skills of language learning, they are helping the schools to achieve the target of reaching higher passing rate of that particular language. Thus, I agree that the teachers' belief are always being changed because of taking schools' aims into consideration to their teaching.
Evaluation for every chapter is a necessity or to ensure that the students are exposed to enough knowledge of this particular language in classrooms. Sheldon’s checklist is impressionistic and it is superficial. I personally think that the checklist needs to be improvised. On the one hand, I think that in depth analysis cannot help the teachers or the evaluators to choose a good textbook. This is because only a few chapters are selected for evaluation and I personally think that it is deficient as it does not mean that the selected chapters can represent the whole textbook. So, what I think is when it comes to evaluating a textbook, all chapters should be included for evaluation to determine whether the textbook is suitable for English language learning. The checklist sample that I preferred the most is William’s checklist. The criteria under several categories are listed in the checklist just to make sure that the textbook is usable although it is a tiring work. 

Conclusively, what I think is being a teacher is uneasy. Before they start to teach, students’ proficiency levels and sociocultural difference need to be considered before developing any teaching and learning materials. They have to apply the principles and theories in order to provide enough information and ensure the students learn something and finally being a successful learner. They also need to provide scaffold, giving guidance or being a facilitator just to ensure that the students learn the language. After all, the teachers have to take the curriculum relevance requirement under consideration to their teaching. Eventually, the evaluation is required to show that whether the activities or tasks created according to whole class proficiency levels is applicable or suitable. It can be a peer evaluation among the teachers or collect opinions from students that have been exposed to the activities before. 


  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS